This should be called "Stare at my FACE" instead of whatever this actually is called. This is not how you review, that is not the technology you use to make said review, and that is not the method you use to get your point across.
Reviews can be done in several ways, but they generally do cover what was good and what was bad with the subject material at hand. You failed this crucial task. At no point throughout your rambling, addled statements did anything resembling a point get made. When you fail to convey the ideas of the review itself, then you goddamn failed your review.
Second, let's talk tech. I'm not the type of asshole that insists you spend thousands or even hundreds of dollars on equipment; unless you're seriously going into business, there's no point. However, there's a fine line between adequate and atrocity. Guess which part of the spectrum you fall under. For fuck's sake, if you're going to do a video review, then get something better than an eye toy to record your footage. Seriously, this makes 8mm film from the sixties look good.
Third, a review mostly works by being informative and entertaining, and unfortunately you suck huge balls at both of them. I should not feel like I'm suffering an embolism while watching five minutes of footage. I should not have to sit there, watching your fat face, as you stare mindlessly into a light for like three minutes and then drunkenly explain nothing for the last two. If I want that, I'd go to a bar and chat with a frat boy.
In conclusion, you fail everything. I can't really say any more than that.